[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Minutes of Meeting
2nd IXP TWG MEETING
Held at the Coffee Terrace, Grand Imperial Hotel on 18th April 2001
Members Present:
Lunghabo Wire James
Lule Tommy
Steven Mujuubwa
Nsubuga Edward
Rob Gipman
Vincent Kaabunga
Andrew Kataryeba
Proceedings began at 3:30 pm
IXP-TWG 005:
On commencement of proceedings, members acknowledged receipt of
communications from Rob Gipman (MTN), James Lunghabo (Wilken-Afsat)
and Vincent Kaabunga regarding IXPs, and observed that the material
they had been presented with was quite complex and members had not
had enogh time to internalise all the information. It was agreed
that members should continue to share any IXP material that they
may have with the other members and that all members shall
endeavour to read and understand as much material on the subject
as possible.
IXP-TWG 006:
On the costs of setting up the IXP, concerns were raised by
Andrew Kataryeba (The Source) on capital contributions the
ISPs would have to make in the implementation of the IXP,
including purchase of routers, premises, utilities,
air-conditioning, etc.
Rob Gipman (MTN) indicated that MTN is willing to avail space in
its state-of-the-art facilities in Mbuya to house the IXP at no
cost and asked what if the other ISPs would be willing to be part
of an IXP that would be set up by MTN, UTL and CelTel as part of
their license requirements to interconnect for data.
Vincent Kaabunga pointed out that it is usually in the interests
of all IXP partners to have the IXP housed at a neutral location
in a De-militarised Zone. He also mentioned that there are donors
who are willing to provide the core equipment for the IXP, but the
ISPs would still have to provide their own and utilities would
still have to be covered by the IXP association.
James Lunghabo (Wilken-Afsat) shared the same view and mentioned
that most ISPs are not comfortable having their equipment at
another's premises.
It was agreed my the members present to have the IXP at a neutral
location, and all members were to inquire from their respective
management about the capital investment that they could put into
the IXP.
IXP-TWG 007:
James Lunghabo (Wilken-Afsat) and Edward Nsubuga (Sanyutel) inquired
as to whether ISPs should be required to connect to the IXP using
leased lines or could use their own infrastructure instead of
having to pay another provider to link them to the IXP.
Rob Gipman (MTN) pointed out the need for reliability and
redundancy in the medium that is used to connect the ISP to the
IXP. He mentioned that a medium like fiber or leased line could be
chosen, and regulation put in place that set a subsidised rental
for service and protected the ISPs against any change in price. He
cited the example of the Amsterdam IXP, where such a scheme has
been used successfully for over 10 years.
The members present agreed with Mr. Gipman's suggestion, but chose
to have ISPs cut their running costs for connecting to the
IXP by using their own infrastructure provided it meets the
standards for reliability and availability, which will be laid out
at a later date.
IXP-TWG 008:
It was unanimously agreed by the members present that the initial
membership of the IXP shall be for owners of International Data
Gateways.
Membership for any other category of users shall be subject to
review by the Management Working Group.
IXP-TWG 009:
With a vision of Internet growth in the country, members
unanimously chose to operate all peering activity at the IXP
using BGP4, citing its scalability.
The IXP network implementation was not decided and was left for
next meeting when members have received feedback on what
capital investments the prospective partners are willing to make.
IXP-TWG 010:
Members present suggested that the Management WG and the UCC be
kept abreast of developments in the Technical WG.
It was suggested that both be asked to send a representative to
attend the proceedings of the Technical WG
The meeting was adjourned at 5.15pm until Wednesday 25 April 3.00pm.